The Unintended Consequences of Austerity: Mental Health and Job Satisfaction in the Public Sector
Joint work by Andrew Clark (Paris School of Economics), Maria Cotofan (King’s College London), and Jonathan Wadsworth (Royal Holloway).
A growing literature has shown that the austerity measures introduced in the UK starting in 2010 affected a wide range of social and economic outcomes. However, little is known about their impact on workers in the public sector where service-provision funding was directly targeted. We carry out both a difference-in-difference analysis and appeal to variation in the extent of spending cuts at the local level to show how austerity affected public- versus private-sector workers. We find that public-sector workers suffered disproportionately: they increasingly quit the public sector post-austerity, and the workers who remain report persistently higher levels of anxiety and depression caused by their work, as well as lower job satisfaction compared to their private-sector peers. A decade after the start of austerity, significant negative impacts remain apparent. These findings have substantial implications for the welfare of public-sector workers, and raise important questions regarding the delivery of vital public services.









.png&w=3840&q=75)
